Advanced Placement (AP) European History Practice Exam

Which of the following pieces of evidence in the passage does NOT support the claim that Tetzel's treatment of indulgences was viewed as corrupt?

1. Luther's following of academic custom in publishing his Ninety-Five Theses

2. Calls for financial contributions to the church

3. Tetzel's association with the banking house of Fugger

4. Claims that indulgences could guarantee salvation

The correct answer is: Luther's following of academic custom in publishing his Ninety-Five Theses

The choice stating that Luther's adherence to academic custom in publishing his Ninety-Five Theses does not support the claim of Tetzel's corrupt treatment of indulgences is justified because this aspect focuses on Luther's methodology rather than on the content of Tetzel's practices. Luther's approach highlights his scholarly background and his attempt to engage in a debate on theological grounds rather than directly addressing or critiquing Tetzel's actions. The other pieces of evidence directly connect to perceptions of corruption surrounding Tetzel's indulgences. Financial contributions to the church could imply a commercialization of faith, undermining the spiritual intent behind indulgences. Tetzel's connections with the banking house of Fugger suggest a financial exploitation of the faithful, enhancing the notion of corruption. Moreover, claims about indulgences guaranteeing salvation challenge core religious principles, further validating the perception of them being corrupt practices. Thus, the emphasis on Luther's academic custom stands apart from the concerns about Tetzel's methods, confirming that it does not support the claim of corruption in the same way the other pieces do.